The Tamiflu Scam – 1
by PROFKEITH on FEBRUARY 2, 2013
We all know that Tamiflu is a scam. But we are so used to these things being criminally hushed-up, that it comes as quite a shock when one of the world’s leading medical journals accuses Roche of massaging data to make their drug look effective when it isn’t.
The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has alleged that pharmaceutical giant Roche is deliberately hiding clinical trial data about the efficacy of Tamiflu in patients with influenza.
According to experts writing for the BMJ, global stockpiling and routine use of the drug are not supported by solid evidence [meaning it’s worthless and doesn’t work].
Moreover, the BMJ openly accuses Roche of concealing neurological and psychiatric adverse events caused by Tamiflu.
In an open letter published online October 29th, Fiona Godlee, MD, editor-in-chief of BMJ, writing to Dr. John Bell, Professor of Medicine at Oxford University and a Roche board member, told him of concerns that surfaced years ago about the reliability of Tamiflu research.
She was pretty feisty and pointed out that, since only 2 of 10 registered trials (funded by Roche, of course) were ever published, it was clear the other 8 trials showed the ineffectiveness and dangers of Tamiflu, and were therefore suppressed. The published trials therefore can’t be trusted, Godlee said [I like this girl!]
Roche had promised to make complete clinical trial data available, but Cochrane researchers and BMJ claim the company has not done so. In her letter to Roche, Dr. Godlee explained that each clinical trial report typically consists of 5 modules, but only module 1 has been provided for each trial.
So, What Has Roche Got to Hide?
In January 2012, the Cochrane Library published an updated review that included unpublished data and revealed inconsistencies and incomplete data. In her open letter to Roche, Dr. Godlee explained, “The Cochrane reviewers now know that there are at least 123 trials of Tamiflu and that the majority (60%) of patient data from Roche Phase 3 completed treatment trials remain unpublished. The obvious conclusion, says Godlee, is the likely overstating of effectiveness [or fraud, as non-doctors would call it] and the apparent under-reporting of potentially serious adverse effects [or criminal deception, as non-doctors would call it].
Meanwhile, in a media statement responding to Dr. Godlee’s open letter in October 2012, Roche predictably denied withholding clinical data. Roche said it had provided the Cochrane researchers “with access to 3200 pages of very detailed information, enabling their questions to be answered.”
That means they point blank refuse to allow access to the remainder, the stuff they are hiding.
Why, Oh why, can’t these drug company executives just be jailed (preferably for life) and have done with it?
Meanwhile, Tamiflu has just been added to the list of essential drugs alongside aspirin and beta blockers.
Notice that Roche are paying Professor Bell as one of their lackeys. That guy is teaching medical students. What’s he teaching them: lies, connivance, corruption—all at the patients’ expense, of course?
[SOURCE: BMJ. Published online October 29, 2012.